Generative AI
Custom instruction data, RLHF preference datasets, red-teaming, benchmarking and expert evaluation for language and multimodal AI products.
Data quality depends on the failure modes of generative ai.
A useful dataset must represent how the product will actually be used—not just reach a large row count. We design the workflow around domain constraints, model risk and measurable acceptance.
Discuss your use case ↗What makes this data difficult.
Reviewer disagreement on tone, helpfulness and correctness
Fast-changing model failure modes after each release
Need for stable regression benchmarks
Programs designed around product outcomes.
Instruction tuning datasets
Pairwise response ranking
Rubric-based model evaluation
Safety and policy red-teaming
Domain expert benchmarking
More than a folder of files.
The exact specification is project-dependent, but delivery should make provenance, quality, format and limitations understandable.
Build the operating model around the use case.
AI evaluation & RLHF
Human preference, rubric-based evaluation and red-team datasets for improving model behavior and reliability.
Explore service ↗02LabelData annotation
Human annotation workflows with clear taxonomies, calibrated reviewers and measurable acceptance criteria.
Explore service ↗03VerifyDataset QA
Independent audits for label quality, leakage, imbalance, duplication, provenance and documentation quality.
Explore service ↗Questions about generative ai data.
Can you create RLHF preference datasets?+
Yes. We scope pairwise ranking, multi-response selection, rubric scoring and reviewer rationale workflows around the target behavior.
Do you work with multimodal generative AI?+
Yes. Evaluation can combine text with images, documents, audio or video depending on the model interaction.
Plan a generative ai data program.
Tell us the model objective, current failure mode and available data. We will help structure the pilot and acceptance criteria.
Start a conversation ↗