Industry solutions · generative AI training data services

Generative AI

Custom instruction data, RLHF preference datasets, red-teaming, benchmarking and expert evaluation for language and multimodal AI products.

Industry reality

Data quality depends on the failure modes of generative ai.

A useful dataset must represent how the product will actually be used—not just reach a large row count. We design the workflow around domain constraints, model risk and measurable acceptance.

Discuss your use case
Common challenges

What makes this data difficult.

01

Ambiguous quality criteria across open-ended outputs

02

Reviewer disagreement on tone, helpfulness and correctness

03

Fast-changing model failure modes after each release

04

Need for stable regression benchmarks

High-value use cases

Programs designed around product outcomes.

01

Instruction tuning datasets

02

Pairwise response ranking

03

Rubric-based model evaluation

04

Safety and policy red-teaming

05

Domain expert benchmarking

Typical deliverables

More than a folder of files.

The exact specification is project-dependent, but delivery should make provenance, quality, format and limitations understandable.

Evaluation rubric and reviewer guide01
Preference or scored response dataset02
Disagreement and quality analysis03
Versioned benchmark set04
Dataset card and known limitations05
Frequently asked questions

Questions about generative ai data.

Can you create RLHF preference datasets?+

Yes. We scope pairwise ranking, multi-response selection, rubric scoring and reviewer rationale workflows around the target behavior.

Do you work with multimodal generative AI?+

Yes. Evaluation can combine text with images, documents, audio or video depending on the model interaction.

Build for the real environment

Plan a generative ai data program.

Tell us the model objective, current failure mode and available data. We will help structure the pilot and acceptance criteria.

Start a conversation